# /programs/ourwork/collectivecoll/archives/backlogtools.htm

originally: http://www.oclc.org/programs/ourwork/collectivecoll/archives/backlogtools.htm

# Develop a Holistic Approach to Archival Collections Assessment Problem statement: An accurate census of its archival collections enables an institution to act strategically in meeting user needs, allocating available resources and securing additional funding. The systematic gathering of quantitative and qualitative data about collections (including processed, under-processed and un-processed collections) makes possible the provision of adequate, consistent, collection-level descriptions; affords a better understanding of unmet preservation needs; and informs important decisions regarding collection management, processing priorities, and selection and other activities associated with digitization and exhibit preparation. Although a number of institutions have undertaken collections assessments, a single, commonly-understood approach does not exist. Impact: Standard or "best" practice regarding collections assessment, including its methodologies and deliverables, would make it easier for institutions of all types to undertake collections assessments. It would also enable aggregation of information across and among institutions. This project will: identify existing assessment instruments and methodologies; describe the range of deliverables from these instruments and methodologies; and recommend best practices. A working group has been assembled to move forward with these tasks. ### Working Group Members
Name | Institution
--- | ---
Martha Conway | University of Michigan
David DeLorenzo | University of California, Berkeley
Christine Di Bella | Institute for Advanced Study
Sarah Stauderman | Smithsonian Institution
This working group is staffed by Senior Program Officer Merrilee Proffitt. |
For more information Merrilee Proffitt Senior Program Officer merrilee_proffitt@oclc.org